Last month, I presented benefits associated with beginning the commissioning process during the design phase. This month, I would like to present some numbers that might help quantify the value to building owners of starting early.
I noticed recently that in full-scale commissioning projects — i.e., those which start early in design and extend through the first year of occupancy — approximately 25% of the total commissioning fee is expended during the design phase. I then investigated how the remainder of the fee is typically split between the other phases of a project, specifically the Early Construction Phase, the Testing and Training Phase (late construction), and the Post-Occupancy Phase.
Table 1 illustrates the distribution of total fees for two projects. Project 1 is a large project ($100 million) and Project 2 is a medium-sized project ($25 million). In general, for similar scopes of commissioning services, this breakdown is very consistent.
|
Commissioning Fees Schematic Design Through Post-Occupancy |
||
| Project | 1 | 2 |
| Design Phase | 29% | 26% |
| Early Construction Phase | 25% | 26% |
| Testing & Training Phase | 36% | 39% |
| Post-Occupancy Phase | 10% | 8% |
Table 1
The following tables outline what the commissioning fees for the same two projects would be if commissioning was introduced soon after the construction contract was awarded without a commissioning specification. The total fee would be reduced by 15-20%, but the owner would lose much of the benefit of commissioning design reviews and the documentation and training planning process.
|
Commissioning Fees Early Construction Through Post-Occupancy |
||
| Project | 1 | 2 |
| Total Commissioning
Fees/ Full Scale Commissioning |
82% | 85% |
| Design Phase | 0% | 0% |
| Early Construction Phase | 44% | 44% |
| Testing & Training Phase | 44% | 46% |
| Post-Occupancy Phase | 12% | 10% |
Table 2
What is the value to the owner of finding and addressing system performance issues during design instead of after equipment has been ordered, installed, and/or started up? What is the potential “extra” the contractors will want in order to add commissioning to their scope of work via change order? When one considers that commissioning fees typically range from 0.5% to 1.0% of total construction cost, saving 15-20% on commissioning fees equates to less than 0.2% of the total construction budget.
Similarly, the following tables represent fees for the same projects if commissioning were introduced towards the end of construction.
|
Commissioning Fees Testing & Training Through Post-Occupancy |
||
| Project | 1 | 2 |
| Total Commissioning
Fees/ Full Scale Commissioning |
65% | 75% |
| Design Phase | 0% | 0% |
| Early Construction Phase | 0% | 0% |
| Testing & Training Phase | 85% | 89% |
| Post-Occupancy Phase | 15% | 11% |
Table 3
The facility owner could realize 25-35% commissioning fee savings (or up to 0.35% of total construction) if they waited until the end of the project to start the commissioning process. However, what is the risk to the owner of contractor change orders or the discovery of major performance problems or schedule delays?
Owners need to make these cost/benefit decisions for themselves based on the unique set of circumstances surrounding each project. Perhaps the numbers presented here can be used as input to more objective decision-making in the future.
Engineered Systems, November, 2008
by
Rebecca Ellis, PE, LEED AP, CCP, CxA
President
Questions & Solutions Engineering
1079 Falls Curve
Chaska, MN 55318
rteesmag@QSEng.com